Cont’d attempts collect debt not owed

Prince Parker and Associates has been repeatedly calling me to collect a debt they allege is from XXXX XXXX XXXX. When pressed, they say they received the ” file ” from XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX for a debt from XXXX! I am not an XXXX XXXX XXXX customer, but I was, and I was until later than XXXX. Any bill from XXXX should have come to my attention in XXXX, and at the very least I should have been informed when I discontinued service with XXXX XXXX XXXX, around XXXX or XXXX, I think. When asked why the first notice of this debt comes from a questionable collection agency 10 years post alleged debt — they say ” call XXXX XXXX XXXX. ” I therefore believe the debt is pure fiction, and that the collection efforts are a fraudulent attempt at nuisance money. Plus, XXXX XXXX XXXX should not be allowed to sell whatever spurious information they have that allows companies like Prince Parker to ” defend ” their actions in pinning debt on people completely unconnected to the original debt.

Leave a Reply